WebBeautify

Formatters

XML Formatter

XML still runs payments, sitemaps, RSS, and Android resources. An XML formatter does not make that fashionable. It makes the tree visible so you can see why a feed closed the wrong tag.

Input 0 B
Output

Drop a file on the left. Drafts stay in this browser. Shortcut: Ctrl or Cmd + Enter to run.

How this xml formatter works

  1. Paste or drop a .xml file into the input on the left.
  2. Flip options if you see them (comments, indent, case). Defaults are the safe ones.
  3. Hit Run, or Ctrl / Cmd + Enter. Leave “Process on server” off unless you mean it.
  4. Read the status line, then copy, download, or jump to a related tool.

Well-formed first

Indent follows nesting. Attributes stay on their tags. If the document is not well-formed, validate first — pretty-print on broken XML is a guess. Sitemaps and SOAP envelopes are good candidates; binary-ish Office XML is not a fun paste and may be too large for a casual editor.

Frequently asked questions

What does formatting XML actually do to the file?

Formatting XML is about a stable shape: indent, wrapping, keyword casing where it helps. Example: <item><id>1</id></item> reads easier as <item>\n <id>1</id>\n</item>. It is not a linter and not a compiler.

Should I format XML before I go live, or while I edit?

Edit in a readable shape. formatting belongs to the moment the file has to be understood (beautify/format/validate) or the moment it leaves your hands (minify/encode). Mixing those moods is how minified HTML becomes your only source of truth — a sad place to live.

Can formatting XML break what I already put live?

Well-formed XML cares about nesting and one root. Beautify will not invent a schema; it only makes the tree readable. Glance at the output once. A 20-second read beats a 20-minute “why did production go weird” thread.

Got a simple before-and-after for xml formatter?

Sure. Before: <item><id>1</id></item> After: <item>\n <id>1</id>\n</item>. That is the whole mood of the tool — same job, different clothing. If your real file is huge, try a representative slice first so you can see the rule, not a wall of text.

What about comments, strings, and data that look like code?

Strings are data. 'a + b' is not math. Comments are notes — minify may drop them, beautify should keep them if the engine sees them. XML has its own trap: Well-formed XML cares about nesting and one root. Beautify will not invent a schema; it only makes the tree readable.

Any fun XML fact worth remembering?

Fun fact: XML is case-sensitive. <Item> and <item> are different tags. HTML is famously sloppy about that. Beautify will not merge them for you.

Do I still need a bundler, Prettier, or a schema tool?

For an app in git: yes — keep the project formatter and the bundler. This xml formatter is for the five-minute paste: a log line, a vendor dump, an email template, an API body. Different altitude, same mountain.

When should I not use a xml formatter?

Skip it when the file is a binary, when you need a full language compiler, or when a single sample cannot represent the format (Excel workbooks, YAML with anchors, HTML that is really a React tree). Also skip minify as your only copy of source. Keep a readable original.